|
|||
|
Great Britain was the mother of modern and imperialist capitalism, and London the centre of the International Working Mens’ Association, the First International, led by Marx and Engels. Today it remains one of the pillars of the world conservation of capitalism, though compelled to leave the leadership of imperialism to the U.S.A.; but it is no longer the centre of the revolutionary proletariat.
To make up for its relative decline, British capitalism was the first to experiment with a strategy for imposing a ruthless control over the working class, a strategy which it is still refining and which is exemplary of its kind. It blandished the workers with economic and social allowances, while entangling them in the ingratiating webs of the most perfect example of parliamentary democracy that history has ever known. Realistically recognising the class function of the working class within the bourgeois regime, it established relations of permanent collaboration with the Labour Party and with the workers’ unions.
In spite of a long tradition of struggles the British proletariat hasn’t yet managed to move beyond the elementary union organization, nor, unlike the other European countries, to express a revolutionary communist movement. The word communism itself is today ignored or mocked, but the policies of the Government and their lackeys, aiming to prevent the self-emancipation of the proletariat, demonstrate how much they loathe communism and the communist dictatorship; namely, the one regime able to emancipate the working class from the capitalist dictatorship.
Trade Unions and the Labour Party today organise the British workers, and lead them on the basis of collaboration with the capitalist State and its regime. Minority groups such as trotskists lack any programmatic and ideological continuity and are therefore incapable of showing the British proletariat the way to the class revolt. In these circumstances the main duty of real communists, the disciples of Marx and Lenin, is to "import" the program of revolutionary communism into the ranks of the British working class; in the knowledge that when the class struggle revives, under the impact of a new world-wide economic crisis, the class will join forces with it, together with proletarians in other countries. The workers of Great Britain are today entitled to sum up the harsh lessons of almost a century of Labour Party and T.U.C. solidarity with the bourgeois State and the democratic regime. In the present situation of increasing economic difficulties, no "left-wing" or "right-wing" Labour or Conservative government is any more able to make concessions to the working class. All that remains are demagogic promises, with ever greater sacrifices imposed on the working masses by means of an ever tougher and more totalitarian statal authoritarianism. It will become increasingly clear that capitalism, in the native land of liberalism, can only survive the attacks of communism by setting up a police State, an open dictatorship.
The categorical imperative of the
present
day is, therefore, the reorganization of the proletariat into one
single
political party, one which has totally broken with the social
democratic
policies of the bourgeoisie and which is homogeneous in doctrine,
praxis
and organization; a party, that is, which has assimilated the lessons
deduced
by the Communist Left from historical experience. It is with this aim
in
view that the few revolutionaries organised in the International
Communist
Party are making the effort to transmit intact to their British
brothers
and sisters the radiant program which led to the October Revolution.
September 1980
foreword
to text no 3, "Theses on the Nature and Role of the Revolutionary Communist Party"
Although victorious, along with the United
States of America and Russia, in the second imperialist war, England
lost
forever it’s predominance in the imperialist world; but it didn’t lose
its domination over the metropolitan proletariat, which it had used to
dominate the colonial peoples and oppressed nations of the world.
By way of these meager and rare texts,
products
of the Communist Marxist Left, the proletariat, smarting from its many
defeats at the hands of its deadly enemy by whom it continues to be
exploited,
here makes an umpteenth effort, and not the last, to reread correctly
the
history of its class, using them to rebuild its revolutionary political
party. Because this is the point: to rebuild the class political party
of the proletariat.
The four texts that this pamphlet contains are a contribution, even
if a small one, toward reaching this great historical objective, to
which
true communists call proletarians and above all young proletarians. The
English working class has frequently launched powerful and wide-ranging
struggles to defend its economical conditions, in order to fight
against
capitalist greed and in support of the official political organization
that claims to represent their interests, the Labour Party. But these
struggles
have neither freed them from their centuries old condition of being
exploited,
nor resulted in the acquisition of an advanced political position
towards
capitalism and its State. These struggles, and the network organized by
the Unions and the Labour Party, haven’t allowed them to confront the
bourgeois
regime as an independent and autonomous class. The English proletariat,
on a see-saw of Conservative and Labour governments, has been played
with
like a tennis ball. As long as Great Britain controlled a colonial
empire,
certain economical and social concessions were made to the proletariat
in exchange for its social and political "availability"; but now that
British
colonial predominance is a thing of the past, not only is the English
proletariat
fast losing all of its privileges, but it is also unable to recover its
class independence.
The reason for this tragic situation is the
absence of the revolutionary political party in England and in the
world.
If the English proletariat doesn’t start making preparations, with the
support of proletarians of other countries, for the building of its
political
party, it can never hope to free itself from the rule of the capitalist
regime, especially if this rule is exercised by "socialist", "labour",
or "workers’" parties that falsely proclaim themselves to be acting in
the name of the workers. Such work requires sacrifice, abnegation,
strength,
patience and the commitment of workers who in for "the long haul", who
are interested in learning from the history of the world proletariat.
In
the spirit of dedication to this work, we present these texts to our
brothers,
so that they can get nearer to the programmatic bases of the party, on
which the political organization rests; because without its historical
programme, the proletariat cannot finally triumph over the capitalistic
bourgeoisie.
Today, this may all seem a dream, a utopia,
but myths have always had a way of urging the working classes on to
overcome
"harsh reality", shattering that notion of the enemy’s invincibility
which so undermines the confidence of working classes. But an even
greater
weakness is the lack of the party. Therefore the party must come first.